One of the
memories that always stays with you as a parent is the sight of your firstborn
taking his or her first few steps.
After weeks of your little one hauling himself or herself up off the floor and standing there on wobbly legs, smiling; there comes a moment when they decide to let go and make for something a few steps away.
And that’s when it
all begins – the sometimes painful but ultimately rewarding business of
learning to walk.
Today’s excerpt
from the story of Abraham reminds me a little of those first few stumbling
steps of childhood. Last week we saw Abram make a good beginning when he
decided to let go and move away from everything he knew in response to God’s
promises.
I will give you a family, God had said. And I will give you this land
of Canaan as the place
where they shall live.
And so Abram set
out from Haran , and he and his entourage
literally walked the land; moving from place to place, building altars at
Shecem and Bethel .
Getting a feel for this place and its peoples.
And in time, his
wandering took him south west, into the dry, rocky area west of the Dead Sea
known as the Negeb or the Negev .
And it’s there,
after a promising start, that Abram’s wobbles begin.
“There was a famine in Canaan ” says the writer of Genesis 12. And in a
way, that’s no surprise. I remember being in that neck of the woods many years
ago and noting that at 8am in the morning the temperature had already reached
30 degrees. Rainfall is always scarce in that part of the world; very little
grows, and it wouldn’t take much of a drought to make parts of the country
virtually uninhabitable.
Now if you’re in
that part of the land, and things are getting tough, the conventional wisdom is
that you should go down to Egypt .
The Negev relies
completely on rainfall – Egypt
has the backup system of the world’s longest river running through its
backyard.
So the obvious
thing – the logical thing – for Abram to do was to make for Egypt .
However, I don’t
know if you’ve spotted the possible flaw in that logic.
Why had God asked
him to leave Haran ?
To go to the promised land of Canaan . What was
he now doing, at the first sign of trouble? Leaving the promised land of Canaan !
And yet at no
point, do we read of Abram scratching his head and wondering if that was the
right thing to do. Whether God might have some alternative plan up his sleeve
to see him through this difficulty.
As far as we know
he doesn’t do anything to try and establish what God would have him do. In
fact, God seems to be conspicuously absent from this bit of decision making. And
that will come back to haunt Abram.
Now it’s easy to
criticise from a distance of 40 centuries, and it’s not my people who are
struggling for food and water and about whose fate I have to make decisions.
But the promised land had its own river, the Jordan ,
and it supported life and agriculture along its banks, just like the Nile .
Could Abram have
looked north rather than south to solve the problem?
Could he have
stayed in Canaan and survived, albeit with difficulty, rather than risking
everything in Egypt ?
Well, we can’t be
sure. But it seems clear that he didn’t pause to ask the question.
And I think that’s
our first learning point from today’s story.
In life, we invite trouble when we don’t
take the time to pray and gain God’s perspective on our situations.
Each day we all
make thousands of decisions and most of them are largely inconsequential. I
know the theory that’s called the butterfly effect would suggest otherwise, but
I’m pretty sure my choice of socks or breakfast cereal this morning isn’t going
to have lasting consequences for my life or anyone else’s for that matter.
But there are
times, when all of us find ourselves standing at junctions where we have to
make decisions and where the path that we take can, in Robert Frost’s words,
make all the difference.
Am I going to
marry that person? Am I going to stay with them when things get difficult?
Will I take that
job? Do the rewards outweigh the costs?
Will I buy that particular
house? What sacrifices will I have to make in order to be able to pay it off?
Maybe there’s an
activity that I, or someone in my family, loves to do, but it takes place regularly
on a Sunday morning. How do we go about deciding what we’re going to do?
In a recession,
where do I make the cuts I’m going to have to make in order to get by?
We can all of us
look at these kinds of questions and make logical choices about them. But the
point I’m making is that the way of logic isn’t always the way of faith.
If he’d set out to
merely logical, Abram wouldn’t have left home and people and livelihood. It
doesn’t make sense.
Following the
logical path would have kept Moses tending sheep, Peter in his fishing boat and
Jesus off the cross.
The logical thing
to do isn’t always the right thing to do.
Now I’m not
arguing for the merits of irrationality here. But I am arguing that the people
of God need to use faith as well as logic when it comes to our decision making.
Are we really trusting the God we say we believe in? Or are we merely trusting
our own wits and intuition?
Having begun well,
it’s starting to look like Abram’s forgotten who brought him to the promised
land in the first place.
And things go from
bad to worse.
Just as they’re
about to arrive in Egypt ,
Abram comes to the worrying conclusion that his lovely wife is going to attract
unwanted attention. Might sound unrealistic for a woman well into middle age,
but to that objection I have a two word rebuttal – Helen Mirren!
And Abram worries
that in order to get Sarai, someone’s going to try to get him. So he cooks up
this story about them being brother and sister rather than husband and wife,
because in the culture of the day, it would be the responsibility of a woman’s
brother to deal with potential suitors in the absence of her father. And that
meant they might look more kindly on Abram.
So that’s the
little white lie they settle on as they pass through customs and immigration.
And it ends up backfiring spectacularly.
And it’s another
instance of Abram going about his business in a way that’s more about trusting
his wits than his God.
And the
commentaries have a field day with this particular incident in his life.
One or two,
controversially, see this as a piece of crass manipulation on Abram’s part and
reckon he was getting ready to do some horse-trading and swap Sarai for some
loot. But in a culture that prized fidelity very highly, that seems far too
damning a verdict.
Perhaps more
kindly, some suggest that the lie was only meant to protect them in the short
term, until the famine ended. Maybe Abram thought he could fend off any
potential interest in Sarai by playing the part of the hard-nosed brother who
wasn’t going to settle for anything but an extortionate dowry.
But in the end, of
course, the decision was taken out of their hands because the only man in the
land who couldn’t be refused came calling. Pharaoh took a shine to Sarai and arranged
for her to be brought to the palace; the latest addition to what was probably a
sizeable harem.
Can you imagine
what that must have been like for both of them?
The utter
powerlessness they must have felt when all the might of Egypt came
calling? How could they refuse?
Can you imagine
the agonised, whispered conversations they must have had in the dead of night
while the servants were sleeping? Turning options over and over in their minds,
but never finding one that would save them.
Can you imagine
the look that must have passed between them as Pharaoh’s officials finally came
to take Sarai away, leaving Abram surrounded by a dowry of sheep, goats, camels
and slaves but feeling eviscerated in the middle of it all. Watching his wife
being taken away to the household and the bedroom of another man whose status
he could never hope to challenge.
Utter powerlessness. That’s what they must have been feeling.
They’d been
promised descendants and a place to live. In that moment it looked like both
promises were dead in the water.
But the lesson of Egypt , for
Abram and Sarai, and for us, is that when our resources are at an end, God’s
are just beginning.
Out of this
situation of utter hopelessness, he works deliverance for them. He works it
because he has plans for their future, and he won’t see that messed up, even
when they’ve stupidly placed themselves in danger.
Now the Bible’s quiet
on what passed between Sarai and Pharaoh – we don’t know whether their marriage
was consummated or not. But the Jewish Midrash – their ancient commentary on
the Old Testament – takes great delight in describing the very personal nature
of the discomfort Pharaoh and some of his household experienced.
And when you remember
that in the ancient world sin and disease were thought to go hand in hand, you
can understand how Pharaoh comes to the conclusion that Sarai - and her
undisclosed marital status - are the root of the problem.
Before you can say
jack robinson she and Abram are summoned by Pharaoh and after rounding on Abram
for his deception, he angrily dismisses them in just four Hebrew words: “here
wife, take, go”.
And so they leave
and return to Canaan : wiser, perhaps, and
definitely richer because Pharaoh, unaccountably, let them keep the dowry he’d
given them. Maybe he was worried about what might happen if he didn’t.
But it wasn’t just
wealth they brought back with them to Canaan .
They now knew God in a way they hadn’t before. They now knew from practical
experience that God is always greater
than the situation we find ourselves in, no matter how hopeless it might seem.
And that’s a principle
that runs the whole way through the story of the Bible, and that God’s people
have to keep learning again and again.
I don’t know if
you spotted it, but the parallels between the story we’ve just heard and the
story of the Exodus are uncanny. Many years after Abraham, his descendants
would once again go down to Egypt
because of famine.
In time, they too
would end up in Pharaoh’s clutches, in a situation which seemed utterly
hopeless. But then God, through Moses, delivered them; he sent plagues on the
Egyptians, and the Israelites left the land with the wealth of Egypt in their
kit bags.
And the parallels
don’t end there - this ceremony that we celebrate today – the Lord’s supper –
is the self-same story of deliverance, writ large on the canvas of history not
for one man, or one nation, but for all the peoples of the world.
Foolishly, our
race stumbled into the captivity of sin and death and our existential situation
became utterly hopeless. We could do nothing to save ourselves. Nothing.
But then God
intervened in Christ, to overcome sin and death through his self-giving on the
cross. And he made a way for us out of our captivity – a way that is open for
anyone to take. Whether we call it the way of faith, or the way of the cross,
or the way of discipleship doesn’t really matter. What matters is that your
feet are on it, and that you’re moving in the right direction.
The stories of
Abram in Egypt ,
the Exodus, and of Christ’s death on the cross bring us the same piece of good
news, albeit separated by centuries.
They show us that God
is always greater than the situation we find ourselves in, no matter how
hopeless it might seem.